Bansal, Sharma, and Daga: Soil: forensic interpretation some cases study


Introduction

Soil is relatively a thin mantle over the land surface of earth which is comprised of main five components that are minerals, living organisms, organic matter, gas and water. It is a porous material and having many properties. Its solid phase consists of organic products of flora and fauna and inorganic products of weathered rock or transported material. And it is porous phase holds the water and gases together. Some of the soil products has its remnants in the form of sand, stones, leaf, and grains but others like clay minerals.1, 2 During the chemical changes occurred between organic and inorganic material during the soil formation the soil becomes humus and the resulting soil can varying in the range of texture from sandy soil to clayey material and also changed in its organic content. Soil has its types. Mainly four types of soils are present on the earth these are sandy soil, slit soil, clay soil, and loamy soil. Peat soil and chalk soil are also the types of soil. The different types of soil are present at different places. Its properties can vary from places to places over the earth’s surface. The properties also vary from top to bottom through the succession of horizons or layers that constitute the soil profile.3

In this study we reported the soil case importance in forensic interpretations, which is present all over the land and provide vital information about the presence of victim, criminal and suspects at the place of occurrence. The soil present on the shoes of the criminal, or on the clothes of the criminal, or anyone who present at crime scene. It can be applied almost each type of crime and crime scene which to investigate many crimes such as hit-and-run accidents, rapes, burglaries, automobile collision, primary or secondary spot, and etc.

Forensic soil examination is used for linking the suspect, victim and their presence to the crime scene. Forensic investigators picked the soil from the crime scene as a controlled soil and picked the soil from the tyres of car, shoes and clothes of the victim and criminal and then comparison of soil is done by various methods to investigate the case.3, 4

Concept for Forensic Importance of Soil

Areas of exposed soil in or around a crime scene raise the possibility of soil being transferred to the suspect's shoes or tires upon entry or departure. Impacts in hit and run accidents frequently result in the deposition of under-body dirt or mud (on the street).Two factors are of primary importance when looking to soil as possible associative evidence:

  1. The time elapsed from contact with the crime scene soil to apprehension of a suspect.

  2. iThe nature of the soil itself.

Assume the ideal situation of a muddy flower bed below the point of entry in a burglary through which the suspect has walked. Following departure from the scene, the adhering soil will begin to come off and new materials, possibly other soils, will be picked up on the suspect's shoes.5 The likelihood of success for a soil comparison decreases rapidly with the passage of time after the incident. Soil is a complex mixture of weathered rock, minerals, salts, organic matter, microorganisms, and moisture. Soils adjacent to places of human habitation have varying degrees of individuality through debris or treatments introduced into the soil. Oil, insecticides, peat moss, sawdust, metal shavings, industrial materials, and colored rock are all examples of possible soil inclusions.6

Collection and Preservation of Soil Samples

  1. Shoes with dried mud adhering to them should be marked and sealed in a plastic bag.

  2. Soil adhering to objects that are not convenient to impound should be removed, placed in a plastic bag, carton or vial then sealed and marked.

  3. Comparison samples from the suspected source should be collected not only from the point of contact but also from a number of adjacent areas. These samples from the surrounding area will enable the laboratory to determine the variability of the soil in that area. They should be collected at comparable soil depths that the questioned soil sample would have been picked up on the shoes or tires.

  4. The suspect should be questioned as to the source of the mud or soil adhering to his shoes or tires. In the event he offers an explanation, samples should also be collected from this area for comparison purposes.

  5. Flooring, wall scraping and blood stains may also be send for analysis to compare as well as to analyze the possibility of corroborative evidences, from the scene of crime.

Separation of Soil from Various Exhibits

Clear and direct soil exhibits submitted for analysis are always easier to analysis. But in most of the cases soil is adhered with another sample likes blood smeared soil, blood smeared clothes, weapons, shoes, types etc. To separate soil from these various materials is tricky and required experience; some techniques are reported as under –

  1. Blood smeared soil – For this, it is suggested to wash the soil with saline water and run the soil with ultra sonic vibration at least 30 minutes, so the blood adhered to the soil, would leave the bonding and soil separated from blood, then wash it again and use for further examinations.

  2. Blood smeared clothes or clothes – In the case of cloths; these are two folded; i) when the clothes were blood smeared along with soil and ii) clothes were only soil smeared. In i) cases; it is suggested to separate by spreading the clothes on white sheet of 4 x 4 sq. feet paper sheet (may be use as the size of clothes), apply gentle toothbrush or any paint small brush to separate soil on the sheet, then collect and again apply the techniques suggested in the point 1. Blood smeared soil separation techniques. In ii) cases; it is comparatively easy, spread the clothes on the paper sheet, separate the soil using brush, use to compare and examine for further analysis.

  3. Type/Shoes or any tools – in these cases, it is suggested to use more harder brush (using plastics or metallic(sometime)), so that the soil entangles in the tyre ridges can be separate out and use to examine further.

Examination methodology

To examine the soil, we perform preliminary examination as observing the colour of the soil and its nature particularly size and shape. Also some time is query related to trace out foreign element as paper pieces, leaves, grass, seed, brick fragments, glasses, animal and wooden matters is also noted. After pre-examination, the soil is being separated for sample preparation and further analysis like microscopic examination, chemical test and density gradient test, particle size analysis, ignition test and pH test are being applied as available in the working manual of Physics Division, Central Forensic Science Laboratory, DFSS, New Delhi. 7

Cases

Murder case

In a murder case, soil provides great information about the happening at spot and on the suspect belongings. In this case, a son murdered his father at night and throws the dead body outside his house. He beat his father with a bamboo rod so many times on his head and overall body.

Due to so many strikes on head he dead at place and then his son throw the body outside of his house and leave. Next morning when investigating team arrives, they start investigation and collect the evidences from crime scene like blood smeared soil from below the victim’s body, control soil sample from near the victim’s body, blood smeared clothes of victim’s, and blood smeared bamboo. These evidences were sent in forensic science laboratory for examination of blood samples. The examining of the blood sample by the serology and DNA Divisions, the soil sent for further and necessary examination to Physics division along with controlled sample.

On the basis of examination, compared the questioned soil sample with controlled soil sample, provide the evidences that he (son) killed his father (victim) in side house and thrown the body outside the house.

Transported soil/body from primary to secondary scene of crime

Case I

In Jaipur, last Dec 2023, first information received from the SHO, Jothwara that one tunnel has been created by burglars near a bank from as underground shop, vegetable shop. The suspect persons run from the spot. They use tractor to transport the digger soil and they use clothes put in the underground area. Police trace those evidences on the basis of soil transported from one place to another and clothes worn by the suspect.

Case II

In a murder case, Aman is stabbed by knife on highway road and hit by stone on head. His dead body found near the high way track. His brother identifies the dead body of victim and he called investigating agency. After investigation at the scene of crime the investigating team collect some evidences from crime scene. Blood smeared soil, control soil near dead the body, watch wore by victim, blood smeared stone, hair sample, and blood smeared garments of victim. After 10-12 days, suspects were traced by investigating officer. The spotted different place for committing crime, IO asked to forensic evidences to in Forensic science laboratory for further investigation. The soil samples were sent to the physics division to compare the blood smeared soil and control soil that they were match, to verify the location of primary and secondary crime scene. Blood on all other evidences provide information about the victim and suspect connection. Only soil of crime spot and soil from the victim’s worn clothes provided the confirmation of primary and secondary crime scene Locations.

Case III

More than 05 or 06 criminal committed a crime and spot is similar

There was a case where 17 persons encroach in their relative’s house. In the house one man and his wife were present. The people enter in the house forcefully and start beating the man with axe, sword, knife, and with other things on his head and body and also beat his wife and taking out all money and other belongings of the man. After complain received by Police, investigating team arrives and take out such evidences like blood smeared cemented floor pieces, control cemented floor pieces, saree of woman, garments of victim and other evidences.

Those person run away from spot, run through a muddy soil area and farm area, police collected soil from each suspected person shoes and send to FSL analysis. We find 13 people run through the farm area, which proved the evidences of presence of 13 people at spot.

Discussions

The value of soil as positive evidence is limited, particularly when no contaminants or unusual features are present. The soil in the Phoenix area is from a large flood plain, in desert area mainly having similar in composition from one area to another. A soil sample must have a degree of uniqueness from contaminants, soil additives, or industrial components in order for a comparison to indicate a high probability of common origin. The results also earlier reported in our study.8 Traces of soil discovered on footwear were historically among the first types of evidence used by crime scene investigators as reported in many a literature. These type (footwear, tire and tools) of evidence has been re-discovered recently, as the application of powerful analytical techniques developed in recent years and providing quantitative characteristics of the soil (bio/organic and inorganic) chemical composition.9

The benefit of complementary analytical approaches in assessing provenance and of presentation as evidence is discussed.10 The continued new research and developments have developed potentially the role of soil in the crime scene investigation and forensic interpretations in both civil and criminal legal contexts.10

Conclusion

In this study we can conclude that two soil samples can be excluded as having a common source and such a negative finding can be useful in disproving an alibi. The careful collection of soil control samples from several adjacent areas is essential to any comparison.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

JI Thornton AD McLaren Enzymatic Characterization of Soil EvidenceJ Forensic Sci197520467492

2 

K Chaperlin P S Howarth Soil Comparison by Density Gradient Method - A Review And EvaluationForensic Sci Int1983232-316177

3 

PR Antoci N Petraco A technique for comparing soil colors in the forensic laboratoryJ Forensic Sci199338243741

4 

PA Bull RM Morgan S Dunkerley HE Wilson Multi-technique comparison of source and primary transfer soil samples: an experimental investigation by D Croft and K Pye. A commentSci Justice20044431738

5 

K Pye SJ Blott DJ Croft JF Carter Forensic comparison of soil samples: assessment of small-scale spatial variability in elemental composition, carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios, color, and particle size distributionForensic Sci. Int20061635980

6 

S Uitdehaag W Wiarda T Donders I Kuiper Forensic comparison of soil samples using nondestructive elemental analysisJ. Forensic Sci20176248618

7 

DFSS Manual for Physics Division2006CFSLNew Delhi

8 

S Ghajbhye S Sharma M Sharma Analysis of Soil in Crime Cases and Its Importance: Cases StudyForensic Sci Add Res2023614668

9 

RH Ogilvie IK Lednev Soil from footwear is a newly rediscovered type of forensic evidence due to the application of modern analytical techniques: A reviewTrAC Trends Anal Chem2023163117081

10 

LA Dawson RW Mayes BL Murphy RD Morrison Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics: Soil as Physical Evidence in Forensic InvestigationsIntroduction to Environmental Forensics3rd EdAcademic PressUnited States201545786



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 08-08-2024

Accepted : 17-09-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijfcm.2024.027


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 220

PDF Downloaded: 34