Malpractice litigation in multidisciplinary cancer care: Navigating medico-legal challenges and shared decision making in India

---

Review Article

Author Details : Anmol Mahani*, Rudranath Zadu

Volume : 11, Issue : 3, Year : 2024

Article Page : 87-95

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijfcm.2024.022

Suggest article by email

---

Abstract

Healthcare professionals participating in multidisciplinary team (MDT) cancer meetings may not have a comprehensive understanding of their medicolegal responsibilities in current times. This article aims to delineate the principal medicolegal issues pertinent to multidisciplinary cancer care and offer recommendations for future implementation. Key concerns highlighted in this literature encompass patient consent and privacy during MDT meetings, professional liability, the formal expression of dissenting views and the duty of care. The analysis of existing literature prioritizes several recommendations for addressing these issues. Given the limited precedent available for formulating recommendations, this article identifies foundational evidence that can inform the practicing clinicians of these concerns in future MDT practices.Navigating decision-making processes in cancer care poses significant challenges for patients. This article seeks to elucidate the significance of shared decision making (SDM) within the Indian clinical context while pin pointing disparities compared to Western practices. Through a systematic search conducted in Medline and Google Scholar from 2000 to 2019, approximately 400 articles were screened, resulting in the selection of 43 relevant articles (5 from India and 38 from Western sources). The literature underscores a scarcity of information on shared decision making in India as compared to Western contexts, potentially leading to adverse physical, psychological and financial consequences reported by patients. According to one study, While Western data demonstrate extensive involvement of both patients and physicians in consensus-building for treatment decisions, such engagement in India is predominantly observed in tertiary care settings, academic institutions or cases with high therapy costs. Cultural beliefs and biases further influence patient engagement, while communication breakdowns correlate strongly with medicolegal malpractice litigations. Future research endeavours are warranted to explore strategies for integrating shared decision making into routine oncology practice in India. Physicians must actively involve patients or their immediate family members in decision-making processes to ensure a patient-centric approach, thereby mitigating the risks of un-informed decision-making or mistrust in the treating physician's expertise. Efforts such as physician and patient education, tool development, policy formulation, widespread implementation and periodic assessments hold promise for advancing the practice of shared decision making.
 

Keywords: Cancer care, Patient empowerment, Patient engagement, Patient- centred care, Shared decision making.

How to cite : Mahani A, Zadu R, Malpractice litigation in multidisciplinary cancer care: Navigating medico-legal challenges and shared decision making in India. Indian J Forensic Community Med 2024;11(3):87-95

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.