- Visibility 264 Views
- Downloads 337 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijfcm.v.12.i.3.2
-
CrossMark
Contemporary pathways in forensic psychology: A review of psychophysiological perspective of veracity versus deception detection
- Author Details:
-
Yogeeta Bhatia *
Yogeeta Bhatia *
Forensic psychology, as a subfield of psychology, is relatively new and expanding its wings. It covers various spectrums of research, with one prominent one being the dynamics of lying behaviour. A uniform cognitive demand is created by people telling the truth, in contrast to liars, who might experience a high mental load during lying behaviour and post-lying as well, due to the false construction of reality. Suspects in crimes may manufacture and invent stories to find a narrow escape by diverting the investigation. The naked eye may also miss some truths. Hence, forensic psychologists use specific tools (such as eye blink count and duration) to detect deception without violating the civil rights of crime suspects. To evaluate the impact, efficacy and usefulness of these tools, measures or techniques, current research systematically reviewed the existing literature. The Google Scholar database was investigated in depth using several keywords like forensic psychology, polygraph, lie detection, eye blink count, eye blink duration, detection of deception and facial expressions to filter the entries and focus on relevant research. Temporally relevant research from the last 25 years was considered. Lie detection may not be an exact science. A significant variability in findings has been noted. Applicability may be contextualised. Some techniques involving diagnostic tools may enhance their application in modern times.
References
- Ekman P. Lie catching and microexpressions. In: Martin C, editor. The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
- p. 118–33.
- Agosta S, Pezzoli P, Sartori G. How to detect deception in everyday life and the reasons underlying it. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2013;27(2):256–62. 144 Bhatia / Indian Journal of Forensic and Community Medicine 2025;12(3):137–144
- Samuel SG, Chatterjee T, Thapliyal H, Kacker P. Facial psychophysiology in forensic investigation: A novel idea for deception detection. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2019;11(2):90–4.
- Frank MG, Ekman P. The ability to detect deceit generalises across different types of high-stakes lies. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72(6):1429–39.
- Vrij A, Fisher R, Mann S, Leal S. A cognitive load approach to lie detection. J Investig Psychol Offender Profil. 2008;5(1‐2):39–43.
- van Horn JE, Wallinius M, Bouman YH, Renaud P, van Dongen JD. New directions in forensic psychology: applying neuropsychology, biomarkers and technology in assessment & intervention. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1479498.
- Díaz Soto JM, Borbón D. Neurorights vs. neuroprediction and lie detection: The imperative limits to criminal law. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1030439.
- Hyderabadwalla H. Forensic Psychology in India–where are we and where are we going. Indian J Ment Health. 2018;5(2):256–9.
- Vaya SL. Forensic psychology in India. Int Res J Pol Sci. 2015;1(1):29–34.
- Ekman P, Friesen WV. Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. Psychiatry. 1969;32(1):88–106.
- Subramaniam K. A study on the development of the admissibility of polygraph tests in India [Internet]. 2020 Oct 20 [cited 2025 Sep 3]. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3733636.
- Brooks J, McCluskey S, Turley E, King N. The utility of template analysis in Qualitative Psychological research. Qual Res Psychol. 2015;12(2):202-22.
- Fukuda K. Eye blinks: new indices for the detection of deception. Int J Psychophysiol. 2001;40(3):239–45.
- Cheng KHW, Broadhurst R. The detection of deception: The effects of first and second language on lie detection ability. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2005;12(1):107–18.
- Vrij A, Mann S, Kristen S, Fisher, RP. Cues to deception and the ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles. Law Hum Behav. 2007;31(5):499–518.
- Sanchez T. To catch a liar: a signal detection analysis of personality and lie detection. In: 39th Annual Western Pennsylvania Undergraduate Psychology Conference; 2011; New Wilmington, PA. p. 1–5.
- Warmelink L, Vrij A, Mann S, Leal S, Forrester D, Fisher RP. Thermal imaging as a lie detection tool at airports. Law Hum Behav. 2011;35(1):40–8.
- Carlucci ME, Compo NS, Zimmerman L. Lie detection during high‐ stakes truths and lies. Leg Criminol Psychol. 2013;18(2):314–23.
- Sweeney CD, Ceci SJ. Deception detection, transmission, and modality in age and sex. Front Psychol. 2014;5:590.
- Bhutta MR, Hong MJ, Kim YH, Hong KS. Single-trial lie detection using a combined fNIRS-polygraph system. Front Psychol. 2015;6:709.
- Sondhi S, Vijay R, Khan M, Salhan AK. Voice analysis for the detection of deception. In: 11th International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems; 2016; Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 2016. p. 1–6.
- Shaw H, Lyons M. Lie detection accuracy—the role of age and the use of emotions as a reliable cue. J Police Crim Psychol. 2017;32:300–4.
- Thannoon HH, Ali WH, Hashim IA. Detection of deception using facial expressions based on different classification algorithms. In: 3rd Scientific Conference on Electrical Engineering; 2018; Baghdad, Iraq. Baghdad, Iraq: IEEE; 2018. p. 51–6.
- Bablani A, Edla DR, Tripathi D, Kuppili V. An efficient concealed information test: EEG feature extraction and ensemble classification for lie identification. Mach Vision Appl. 2019;30(5):813–32.
- Schindler S, Wagner LK, Reinhard MA, Ruhara N, Pfattheicher S, Nitschke J. Are criminals better lie detectors? Investigating offenders' abilities in the context of deception detection. Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021;35(1):203–14.
- Dando CJ, Taylor PJ, Sandham AL. Cross-cultural verbal cues to deception: truth and lies in first and second language forensic interview contexts. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1152904.
- ter Harmsel JF, Noordzij ML, van der Pol TM, Swinkels LT, Goudriaan AE, Popma A. Exploring the effects of a wearable biocueing app (Sense-IT) as an addition to aggression regulation therapy in forensic psychiatric outpatients. Front Psychol. 2023;14:983286.
- Haneveld KL, Kip H, Bouman YHA, Weerdmeester J, Scholten H, Kelders SM. Exploring the added value of virtual reality biofeedback game DEEP in forensic psychiatric inpatient care-a qualitative study. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1201485.
- Raiche AP, Dauphinais L, Duval M, De Luca G, Rivest-Hénault D, Vaughan T, Proulx C, Guay JP. Factors influencing acceptance and trust of chatbots in juvenile offenders’ risk assessment training. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1184016.
- Leal S, Vrij A. Blinking during and after lying. J Nonverbal Behav. 2008;32(4):187–94.
- Porter S, Brinke TL. Reading between the lies: Identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions. Psychol Sci. 2008;19(5):508–14.
- ten Brinke L, Porter S. Cry me a river: identifying the behavioural consequences of extremely high-stakes interpersonal deception. Law Hum Behav. 2012;36(6):469–77.
- Marchak FM. Detecting false intent using eye blink measures. Front Psychol. 2013;4:736.
- Seymour TL, Baker CA, Gaunt JT. Combining blink, pupil, and response time measures in a concealed knowledge test. Front Psychol. 2013;3:614.
- Perelman BS. Detecting deception via eyeblink frequency modulation. PeerJ. 2014;2:e260.
- Rauch EH. Cues to deception: eye blinking [master's thesis]. San Francisco (CA): San Francisco State University; 2015, p-1–47.
- George S, Pai MM, Pai RM, Praharaj SK. Eye blink count and eye blink duration analysis for deception detection. In: International Conference on Advanced Computing, Communication and Information; 2017; Udupi, India. Udupi, India: IEEE; 2017. p. 223–